Skip to main content

Search the SPREP Catalogue

Refine Search Results

Tags / Keywords

Available Online

Tags / Keywords

Available Online

37 result(s) found.

Sort by

You searched for

  • Tags / Keywords rattus rattus
    X
Eradication du Rat noir et du Rat polynésien des îlots du lagon de Wallis par épandage manuel et aérien de raticide (Wallis-et-Futuna) - Retour d'expérience
Biodiversity Conservation, BRB
Available Online

Pagot, Julie (Service Territorial de l'Environnement de Wallis et Futuna)

,

Singh, Clara (Comité français de l’UICN)

,

des Monstiers, Baudouin (Island Conservation)

2024
L’intervention visait la restauration des écosystèmes des îlots du lagon de Wallis et la préservation des espèces indigènes de faune et de flore par l’éradication des populations des deux espèces de rats. L’objectif de ce projet était également l’amélioration des moyens de subsistance des populations locales et leur intégration à la démarche de gestion. Cette intervention s’inscrit dans le cadre global du Programme Régional Océanien des Territoires pour la Gestion durable des Écosystèmes (PROTEGE), mis en œuvre sur la période 2019-2023 par le Programme régional Océanien de l’Environnement (PROE). A Wallis-et-Futuna, ce projet de dératisation est porté par le STE et bénéficie de l’appui de l’ONG américaine Island Conservation. Au total, 13 îlots ont fait l'objet de ces interventions, représentant une superficie de 223 ha. La dératisation manuelle a mobilisé 15 personnes pendant 15 jours et a nécessité l’utilisation de 1700 kg de raticide et l’appâtage d’une centaine de boites. La dératisation aérienne par drone a mobilisé 10 personnes pendant 500 vols répartis sur 11 journées pour permettre l’épandage de 5 000 kg de raticide. Des retours positifs ont déjà été rapportés par les chefs de village et la population wallisienne quant aux bénéfices des opérations. Ont été signalés : de meilleures récoltes d’arbres fruitiers et des cocoteraies ; une plus grande abondance des crabes de cocotiers et de meilleures conditions de survie lors de l’éclosion des pontes de tortues imbriquées. Un suivi des noddis (oiseaux de la famille des Laridae) mis en œuvre depuis 2023 par la Société Calédonienne d’Ornithologie sur les îlots dératisés en 2021, a montré une augmentation de l’abondance des populations de ces oiseaux.
Restauration des îlots de Wallis - Rapport de mission préliminaire
Biodiversity Conservation, BRB
Available Online

Griffiths, Richard (Island Conservation)

,

des Monstiers, Baudouin (Island Conservation)

2019
Afin de protéger la biodiversité terrestre et marine et de préserver les conditions de vie de la population Wallisienne, il est proposé d’enlever les vertébrés envahissants des îlots situés dans le lagon de Wallis. Dans cette optique, le personnel d'Island Conservation a travaillé conjointement avec celui du Service Territorial de l’Environnement de Wallis et Futuna au cours des mois de Septembre et Octobre 2019 pour entamer le travail de consultation et mieux comprendre les conditions nécessaires à la réussite d’un tel projet. Un panel de vertébrés introduits comprenant des rats, des chats et des cochons est présent sur l’ensemble des îlots du lagon de Wallis, sauf un. Ces espèces constituent une menace permanente pour les plantes et les animaux indigènes des îles et perturbent les processus écosystémiques responsables de la régénération des forêts indigènes et du bon état de santé des récifs. Différentes consultations avec les parties prenantes majeures ont été entreprises et tous les îlots ont été visités et expertisés. Aucun obstacle insurmontable au retrait des espèces envahissantes n'a été identifié et leur éradication est considérée comme réalisable. Une partie des îlots pourrait être traitée manuellement depuis le sol, tandis que les îlots présentant une topographie plus complexe nécessiteraient l'utilisation d’un moyen aérien de type drone pour épandre les appâts contenant le raticide. Préalablement au retrait des rats et des chats, les cochons devront être retirés des îlots où ils sont présents (stratégie présentée au sein de ce document). Des consultations plus approfondies sont essentielles pour fédérer un soutien du public au projet et pouvoir identifier les obstacles à résoudre avant de procéder à l'éradication. Les îlots de Wallis sont régulièrement visités et utilisés par la population. Par conséquent, d’importants efforts et un soutien de la part de la communauté Wallisienne seront nécessaires pour empêcher des réinvasions et assurer la pérennité des bénéfices du projet. Ce projet représente une véritable opportunité pour Wallis de protéger ses ressources naturelles et de développer sa capacité à gérer les problèmes liés aux espèces envahissantes.
The Ecology of Rodents in the Tonga Islands
BRB
Available Online

Twibell, John

The influence on crop damage of Rattus norvegicus, Rattus rattus, and the native Polynesian rat, Rattus exulans, was studied during the establishment of a rat control program for the Tongan Department of Agriculture in 1969. This was the first long-term study of Tongan rodents. Previous scientific literature on Tongan mammals is very sparse. The Kingdom of Tonga, or Friendly Islands, consists of approximately 150 small islands with a combined area of about 256 square miles at lat 21 0 S. The majority of these islands are composed of raised coral limestone ; however, there is a row of six volcanic islands on Tonga's western border. Tongatapu, the location of the government center, is the largest and most important island. The Ha'apai island group lies 80 miles north of Tongatapu, and 150 miles north is the Vava'u group. Fiji is 420 nautical miles east and Samoa is 480 miles north. The climate is tropical and is influenced seasonally by trade winds. Since Captain Cook's first visit in 1773, Western civilization has brought trade, missionaries, and perhaps rats to Tonga. With this shipping came numerous introduced plants and animals. The arrival dates for the common rat, Rattus norvegicus, and the "European" roof rat, Rattus rattus, are not known, but are believed to be more recent, probably since the increase of regular shipping trade and the construction of wharves. Presently rodents account for approximately 20 percent of the agricultural losses and $50,000 worth of economic loss each year (Twibell, unpublished). This is a conservative estimate based on damage counts and observation. In some areas rats destroy or damage up to 50 percent of the coconuts, which represent the main economic crop in Tonga. THE INFLUENCE on crop damage of Rattus norvegicus, Rattus rattus, and the native Polynesian rat, Rattus exulans, was studied during the establishment of a rat control program for the Tongan Department of Agriculture in 1969. This was the first long-term study of Tongan rodents. Previous scientific literature on Tongan mammals is very sparse. The Kingdom of Tonga, or Friendly Islands, consists of approximately 150 small islands with a combined area of about 256 square miles at lat 21 0 S. The majority of these islands are composed of raised coral limestone ; however, there is a row of six volcanic islands on Tonga's western border. Tongatapu, the location of the government center, is the largest and most important island. The Ha'apai island group lies 80 miles north of Tongatapu, and 150 miles north is the Vava'u group. Fiji is 420 nautical miles east and Samoa is 480 miles north. The climate is tropical and is influenced seasonally by trade winds. Since Captain Cook's first visit in 1773, Western civilization has brought trade, missionaries, and perhaps rats to Tonga. With this shipping came numerous introduced plants and animals. The arrival dates for the common rat, Rattus norvegicus, and the "European" roof rat, Rattus rattus, are not known, but are believed to be more recent, probably since the increase of regular shipping trade and the construction of wharves. Presently rodents account for approximately 20 percent of the agricultural losses and $50,000 worth of economic loss each year (Twibell, unpublished). This is a conservative estimate based on damage counts and observation. In some areas rats destroy or damage up to 50 percent of the coconuts, which represent the main economic crop in Tonga.
Predation pressures on sooty terns by cats, rats and common mynas on Ascension Island in the South Atlantic
Biodiversity Conservation, BRB
Available Online

Dickey, R.C.

,

Hughes, B.J.

,

Reynolds, S.J.

2019
Despite the presence of invasive black rats (Rattus rattus), common mynas (Acridotheres tristis), and feral domestic cats (Felis catus), sooty terns (Onychoprion fuscatus) breed in large numbers on Ascension Island in the tropical South Atlantic Ocean. These introduced predators impact the terns by destroying eggs or interrupting incubation (mynas), eating eggs (mynas and rats), eating chicks (rats and cats), or eating adults (cats). Between 1990 and 2015, 26 censuses of sooty terns and five of mynas were completed and myna predation was monitored on 10 occasions. Rat relative abundance indices were determined through trapping around the tern colonies and rat predation was monitored by counting chick carcasses. Cat predation was quantified by recording freshly killed terns. Prior to their eradication in 2003, cats had the greatest impact on sooty terns and were depredating 5,800 adults and 3,600 near-fledging chicks (equivalent to the loss of 71,000 eggs) each breeding season. We estimated that 26,000 sooty tern eggs (13% of all those laid) were depredated by approximately 1,000 mynas. Rats were not known to depredate sooty terns prior to cat eradication but in 2005, 131 of 596 ringed (monitored) chicks (22%) were depredated by rats. In 2009 chick carcass density was 0.16 per m2. Predation by rats hugely increased in the absence of cats and was the equivalent of 69,000 eggs. Care is needed when applying our findings to seabirds globally. The scarcity of alternative food sources and seasonally high density of easily available prey in the sooty tern colony may have magnified predation by cats, rats and mynas.
Rat and lagomorph eradication on two large islands of central Mediterranean: differences in island morphology and consequences on methods, problems and targets
Biodiversity Conservation, BRB
Available Online

Baccetti, N.

,

Capizzi, D.

,

Cencetti, T.

,

De Pietro, F.

,

Giannini, F.

,

Gotti, C.

,

Puppo, F.

,

Quilghini, E.

,

Raganella Pelliccion, E.

,

Sammuri, G.

,

Sposimo, P.

,

Trocchi, V.

,

Vagniluca, S.

,

Zanichelli, F.

2019
Montecristo and Pianosa islands, although approximately equal in surface area (c. 1,000 ha), di?er greatly in substrate, human presence, vegetation and altitude (650 m vs. 30 m asl, respectively). The former island hosts one of the largest yelkouan shearwater (Pu?nus yelkouan) populations in Italy, the latter a depleted remnant of once numerous Scopoli’s shearwaters (Calonectris diomedea). Two consecutive EU-funded LIFE projects have been designed to protect these seabird populations. On Montecristo, rough and inaccessible, aerial delivery of toxic baits in January-February 2012 eradicated black rats (Rattus rattus) and feral rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) (originally a non-target species), with no permanent consequences on a local, ancient population of wild goats (Capra hircus). Eradication on Pianosa, currently underway (started January 2017), is being performed by ground baiting, delivered by 4,750 dispensers placed on a 50 m × 50 m grid throughout the island. The latter operation is included in a multi-species eradication aimed at several other target species, among which was the brown hare (Lepus europaeus), apparently introduced around 1840. Genetic analyses on the ?rst trapped hares showed that this was the last uncontaminated and viable population of L. europaeus subsp. meridiei in existence. Whether of natural origin or introduced, the commencement of eradication of this population has instead created the awareness of a taxon otherwise unavailable for conservation elsewhere. While both projects address the same conservation issues (protection of shearwater colonies and restoration of natural communities), they di?er greatly regarding economic cost, public perception, e? ort needed to maintain results in the long term and e?ects on non-target species. In the present paper, speci?c attention has been paid to the comparison between bait delivering techniques, results obtained, the array of problems originating from the complex regulatory framework and reactions by the general public.
The history of the aerial application of rodenticide in New Zealand
Biodiversity Conservation, BRB
Available Online

Broome, K.

,

Garden, P.

,

McClelland, P.

2019
Following the incursion of rats (Rattus rattus) on Taukihepa (Big South Cape Island; 93.9 km²) off southern New Zealand in 1963, and the subsequent extirpation of several endemic species, the New Zealand Wildlife Service realised that, contrary to general belief at the time, introduced predators do not reach a natural balance with native species and that a safe breeding habitat for an increasing number of ‘at risk’ species was urgently needed. Off shore islands offered the best option for providing predator free habitat but there was a limited number of predator-free islands available and most were very small. Eradicating rodents on larger islands to provide a wider range and greater area of habitats was required and hand treating these larger areas using trapping and hand application of toxicants, the only methods available at the time, proved problematic and often impossible. Helicopters had been used to distribute bait for the control of rabbits and brushtail possums in the past but eradication of any particular predator species was considered ‘not feasible’. The development of a GPS-based aircraft guidance system, a suitable bait product, specialised bait delivery systems and second-generation anti-coagulant toxicants changed that. Now islands as large as South Georgia (3,900 km²) have been treated using this method
Successes and failures of rat eradications on tropical islands: a comparative review of eight recent projects
Biodiversity Conservation, BRB
Available Online

Brown, D.

,

Cranwell, S.

,

Cuthbert, R.J.

,

Griffiths, R.

,

Howald, G.

,

Keitt, B.

,

Pitt, W.C.

,

Tershy, B.

,

Wegmann, A.

2019
Rat eradication is a highly effective tool for conserving biodiversity, but one that requires considerable planning eff ort, a high level of precision during implementation and carries no guarantee of success. Overall, rates of success are generally high but lower for tropical islands where most biodiversity is at risk. We completed a qualitative comparative review on four successful and four unsuccessful tropical rat eradication projects to better understand the factors influencing the success of tropical rat eradications and shed light on how the risk of future failures can be minimised. Observations of juvenile rats surviving more than four weeks after bait application on two islands validate the previously considered theoretical risk that unweaned rats can remain isolated from exposure to rodent bait for a period. Juvenile rats emerging after bait was no longer readily available may have been the cause of some or all the project failures. The elevated availability of natural resources (primarily fruiting or seeding plants) generated by rainfall prior to project implementation(documented for three of the unsuccessful projects) may also have contributed to project failure by reducing the likelihood that all rats would consume sufficient rodent bait or compounding other factors such as rodent breeding. Our analysis highlights that rat eradication can be achieved on tropical islands but suggests that events that cannot be predicted with certainty in some tropical regions can act individually or in concert to reduce the likelihood of project success. We recommend research to determine the relative importance of these factors in the fate of future tropical projects and suggest that existing practices be re-evaluated for tropical island rodent eradications.